Loading
JulianKent Development Stratagem LTD
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Why Choose JKDS
    • Feedback
  • Stratagem
  • Brokerage
  • Property Management
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to WhatsApp
  • Link to Facebook

$50k bond: What $11k a week gets you on the Gold Coast

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

A trophy home described as “like a theme park” could be yours for $11,000 a week, and $50,000 in bond.

Sold sight unseen for $5.75 million to an interstate buyer in 2020, the vast mansion at Hope Island was recently listed for rent.

At the time of the sale, Professionals Vertullo Real Estate agent Mark Carew said the interstate buyer was one of several who made offers to buy the estate sight unseen.

“The borders being closed made it harder for interstate buyers,” he said.

“There were multiple offers from parties outside of the Queensland who see the value.”

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

The 1815sq m trophy mansion sits on a 4982 sqm point position making it the biggest residential holding within the prestigious Rosebank Gardens Estate.

The Mediterranean-style home was built by national car-warranty business owner Gary Chuck and wife Suzanne, who fetched $9.39 million when they sold the prize home in 2004.

It is listed for rent by Rent Better and is available from July 1.

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

To put that weekly rent into perspective, that totals $572,000 a year – more than the median house price in 213 Queensland suburbs.

“Long list of lifestyle features including resort style pool, spa and full-size tennis court,” the rental listing says,

“Buggy ride to Hope Island Marina, moments to championship golf course.

“This waterfront residence occupies the largest block within the exclusive Rosebank Gardens Estate of Hope Island Resort.”

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

Almost every room in the mansion has marina views, with a commercial kitchen available for every size soiree.

“The presidential master suite is also positioned on this level and boasts a huge walk-in wardrobe and dressing room,” the listing says.

“Ascending the staircase to the mezzanine level, the remaining three bedrooms are revealed, all of which include walk-in robes and an ensuite.

“Each bedroom opens onto the balconies offering panoramic water views.”

MORE: Shock as city’s distressed home listings surge 36pc in one month

Work site, skip bin, fencing: River block fetches insane price

Nudity, bikies, illegal plants: Agents reveal their property horror stories

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

Outside is described as “akin to a 5-star resort”, and includes the pool and spa, pool house complete with an outdoor kitchen, shower, toilets and a change room.

There is also a Hollywood-style home cinema with projector and bar, a home office and adjoining library/sitting room, ducted air-conditioning throughout and a 3-car garage.

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

“Properties of this calibre seldom come to market,” the listing says.

The only other listing that is more expensive is a unit listed for $850,000 a week, but we hope that is a typo.

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

1525 Riverdale Dr, Hope Island

The post $50k bond: What $11k a week gets you on the Gold Coast appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39$50k bond: What $11k a week gets you on the Gold Coast

Inside biggest sale of the week on the Gold Coast

3/3531-3533 Main Beach Parade, Main Beach sold in a $7.449m deal in June, 2025.

A beachfront apartment described as “ultra exclusive” has sold in a $7.449m, the highest reported sale on the Gold Coast this week.

The property, on the third floor of the Sea tower at Main Beach, was marketed by Coastal agent Tolemy Stevens.

The tower enjoys more than 12m of beach frontage.

The dining room.

“Sea is one of the most exclusive boutique apartments that I have seen along the beachfront in my 20 years of selling in the area,” Mr Stevens said.

“I was inundated with inquires and inspection requests from buyers around the country and the world wanting information on this residence over the six weeks we had the property on the market.

“It’s another strong sale along the beachfront of Main Beach and the Gold Coast and it goes to show that buyers still feel there is tremendous value for money on the beachfront stretch.”

MORE: Rock star vibes: ‘Bold, luxurious, and unapologetically different’

Death of old money: Young richlisters drive luxury surge

Sea is a renowned for having just seven luxury residences.

The living area.

The 373sq m apartment is one of seven in the Sea building on Main Beach Pde and offers more than 12m of beach frontage.

Designed by renowned architect Bayden Goddard, the boutique development was built with no expense-spared finishes including marble, limestone and travertine.

The indoors merges with the outdoors.

The wraparound balcony.

“The floorplan of 373sq m is extremely generous and the fact you are only sharing with six other ultra exclusive residences is why this holding is so sought after,” he said.

“It has a larger frontage to the ocean than most and with those 2.9m ceilings, creates an environment that astute buyers absolutely love.”

Soak up that view!

One of the bedrooms.

It includes three bedrooms, three bathrooms, an office, lift, media room and generous living, dining and entertaining areas.

Other features include a striking 3.8m marble island bench, Herringbone hardwood floors, gas fireplace, 3m floor-to-ceiling windows and a wraparound northeast balcony with ocean views.

PropTrack reveals the median unit price for a three-bedroom apartment in Main Beach is $2.2m, up 18 per cent.

The highest sale in Main Beach this year is $8.5m, paid in January for an apartment on McArthur Pde.

The post Inside biggest sale of the week on the Gold Coast appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Inside biggest sale of the week on the Gold Coast

Australia’s coldest locations revealed

As winter and its bitter cold starts to settle into our bones and our homes, Australia’s coldest locations have been revealed.

As winter and its bitter cold starts to settle into our bones and our homes, a new study has revealed Australia’s coldest locations.

And it’s not in the often maligned and misunderstood nation’s capital Canberra.

Data crunched by Alliance Climate Control analysed a series of factors including elevation, temperature and daily sonar exposure to discover which Australian cities suffer the coldest winters.

RELATED: Why most Aussies are using their heaters wrong

Mt Wellington

Hobart is very, very cold, this time of year. Picture: iStock

“Our study reveals that while location plays a major role in how cold and ‘chilly’ a city is, the Australian winter isn’t quite so straightforward,” Goran Surbevski – Comfort Advisor at Alliance Climate Control comments.

“Factors such as wind, elevation, latitude and lack of sunlight can all contribute to how cold a city feels.

“Wind, for instance, can significantly enhance the perception of cold through wind chill, making temperatures feel much lower than they actually are.”

According the study the top 10 chilliest locations in Australia are:

1. Hobart

2. ACT

3. Kingston

4. Maroondah

5. Knox

6. Manningham

7. Moonee Valley

8. Whitehorse

9. Brimbank

10. Monash

Hobart ranks as Australia’s chilliest city with a dry bulb temperature of 8.94°C,” the report reads.

MORE: Aus pub’s $500m collapse, staff owed $7m

NEWS: Emergency services weather update, at 70 Collins St

Rug up peeps. Picture: Linda Higginson

“Despite not being the coldest by temperature alone, its high tree canopy coverage (44.1 per cent) and relatively low heating costs ($207) contribute to its top score. Located at -42.88 latitude and just 19 m elevation.

“Hobart experiences low moisture levels (5.03 g/kg) and limited solar exposure (6.73 MJ/m²). Its combination of southern latitude, maritime climate, and strong urban greenery creates a cool, damp winter environment that feels particularly chilly.”

However it is in Canberra and the ACT where winter heating costs are the most expensive, a whopping $236 for the winter months as opposed to $189 in the other top 10 locations listed.

This report comes on the back of revelations that most Aussies are using their heaters the wrong way.

MORE: Huge promise Hemsworths made about Byron Bay

Supplied Two cold fronts will bring gale force winds and cold temperatures to
 the south east. Picture: Sky News Weather.

You have to go far up north to avoid the chill. Picture: Sky News Weather.

Icy mornings across much of the country in recent days have delivered a reminder to many Aussies that no matter how much they blast their heaters, warmth never seems to stay for long.

Housing experts have revealed that this chill isn’t just down to the weather — it’s a design flaw baked into the way Australian homes have been built for decades.

And it means that most households are using heaters in an inefficient way that’s sending their power bills through the roof – without doing an adequate job of keeping the interior warm.

A common problem is that heaters are being used in rooms that lack insulation and are too open and too large for the heater to deliver any meaningful feeling of extra warmth.

MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes

Aerial view of Canberra from Belconnen in the morning

Cold Canberra. Picture: iStock


MORE: Kmart set to change everything in Temu war

The post Australia’s coldest locations revealed appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Australia’s coldest locations revealed

Budget mistake puts half of home buyers at risk

Family in kitchen having breakfast

First home buyers are often only securing their homes after blowing through all their savings.

Panicked first-home buyers are going for broke in the housing market, blowing their budgets to the point where they are in a dangerous financial position of having almost no savings.

A new Finder report revealed almost half (47 per cent) of first-home buyers polled nationally went above their budget, up from 38 per cent in 2022, and many totally drained their savings in the process.

It’s a position that means they will be vulnerable to even the slightest money hiccup and interest rate change and would be financially devastated if their income were to decrease.

“Having a savings buffer is key to financial security, if these Aussies lose their jobs or are hit with an unexpected cost, they will be extremely vulnerable,” said Richard Whitten, Finder loans expert.

MORE: Vanishing kids: silent crisis hits key suburbs

Buyers revealed they felt pressured to spend higher amounts to secure homes due to how competitive the housing market was.

He explained that first-home buyers rarely planned to empty their savings accounts and were often exceeding their budgets after facing enormous financial pressure.

“Aussies are being forced to take more financial risks,” Mr Whitten said.

“Most buyers plan to have some savings left over after the keys have changed hands, (but) with prices continuing to rise, this is no longer realistic.”

Finder’s First Home Buyer Report 2025 revealed the average first-time buyer who went over their budget spent about $63,000 more than they anticipated.

One in 10 spent a whopping six figures more than they expected to, while one in five spent $50,000 more they had budgeted.

The result of this spending was frightening: one in three of those who had bought their first home said they had less than $10,000 in savings. Half of the buyers in this category had zero savings left.

MORE: Boom to bust: where home prices are plunging


Mr Whitten said first-home buyers who overstretched their finances to get into the market would pay a high price over the long term.

“Stretching beyond your means might get you the keys sooner, but it can lock you into years of financial strain,” he said.

Pressure to spend more has coincided with incredible price rises over recent years, particularly during the Covid outbreak.

PropTrack data showed house prices increased by about 70 per cent over five years in Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.

The increase in Sydney over the same period was about 50 per cent, while Melbourne had the smallest increase of a major capital at 15 per cent since 2020.

Finder’s Richard Whitten.

“As house prices surge, first-home buyers are increasingly forced to empty their savings just to enter the market,” Mr Whitten said.

“This leaves them financially stretched – and vulnerable to stress – right at the start of their home ownership journey.”

First-home buyer fears may be contributing to their propensity to overspend.

When Finder last surveyed first-home buyers in 2022, many cited the “fear of missing out” as a key driver.

A mix of peer pressure and concern that property prices would rise faster than wages

prompted some to buy before they were priced out. Since then, property price anxiety

has only grown. It was a common concern for 31 per cent of buyers in 2022, compared to

38 per cent today.

MORE: Shame: 2 selfish banks ripping off Aussies after rate cut

Sunday Telegraph Auction Coverage

A culture of “FOMO” has governed the market at times, prompting buyers to overspend.

Mr Whitten said a first-home was a risky target for overspending.

“The early years of the home buying journey are when buyers are most vulnerable. Their savings are gone and their repayments are mostly interest.”

Mr Whitten added that Aussies should aim to buy within their means even if it meant delaying home ownership a few more years.

The post Budget mistake puts half of home buyers at risk appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Budget mistake puts half of home buyers at risk

Property investor savvy tactics leaving average homebuyers stuck

Property investors are capitalising on lower interest rates and using little-known financial tactics to dramatically increase their borrowing power – leaving competing buyers seeking a roof over their heads at a disadvantage.

These sophisticated strategies were reported to be helping investors secure loans significantly larger than what standard banking criteria would typically permit. The result is an uneven playing field in an already competitive property market.

It’s a trend particularly noteable in Sydney, where Homeloanexperts.com.au senior mortgage broker Jonathan Preston said homes are “no longer about shelter at all – that is long dead and buried”.

MORE: Where you can buy a house for unit price

Lane cove auction

Homebuyers could be in strife with increased investors in the market. Picture: Julian Andrews

MORE: ‘Crazy’ reason young family ditched house for unit

Aus pub’s $500m collapse, staff owed $7m

Instead, he labelled Sydney property “an investment-grade global asset,” while revealing the savvy ways many investors maximise their borrowing capacities to make the most of recent rate cuts.

“Many wealthy borrowers who are looking to build large portfolios these days choose to acquire properties within family trusts, with the view that when they eventually become negatively geared, they can provide a letter from the accountant confirming the positive trading of the entity, and some lenders then allow the trust’s loan to be excluded from servicing.

“This opens up a whole new playing field, where someone can potentially open up multiple trusts and go again and again – subject to not running out of lenders or deposits –

this is the way people are generally getting to 5-plus properties in 2025,” Mr Preston said.

Jonathan Preston senior mortgage broker at homeloanexperts.com.au

The last time investors dominated NSW’s property scene in 2015 – accounting for around 40 per cent of all property purchases at the time – Sydney’s prices ballooned to eye-watering levels, eventually forcing APRA to crack down and introduce regulations to cool investment purchases.

Most investors using some of the above tactics were using interest-only loans, Mr Preston noted, to limit repayments and often seek higher-yielding properties to achieve positive cash flow faster.

He said there has also been a rise in borrowers who are still living with their parents who will then ‘rentvest’ and get into the property market before moving out, with almost a third of purchases he dealt with using this tactic.

“It makes borrowing power way higher,” he said. “Single-income borrowing is horrible right now. Even if you make big money, good luck making enough to buy something nice in Sydney.

A Northern Beaches property in Clontarf with price hopes over $3.55m.

“Borrowing is typically capped at about five times your annual income, so if you want a $3 million property, you are going to need to earn about $600,000 or more.”

He said property buyers prepared to branch out their searches had an additional advantage, adding that most property buyers in Sydney wanted a house and were only interested in the North Shore, Inner West, Northern Beaches, or in the east or south.

“I am a big believer in Western Sydney but many aren’t,” he added.

“So the starting point for those houses is probably north of $2.5 million now; hence, people even buy Gosford, or similar, instead. And northwest is often considered like the North Shore these days,” he said.

Hot Auction in Lane Cove

Homebuyers could see prices pushed up with investors having greater borrowing capacity. Photo: Tom Parrish

Mr Preston emphasised that once location preferences were established, buyers are essentially restricted to buying a unit, settling for a house in Western Sydney or beyond the city boundaries, or somehow managing to earn an annual seven-figure income — a far-fetched scenario for most Australians.

“Even those three options are challenging. For example, a nice apartment in those desired areas is generally more than $1 million.”

MORE: Family’s dilemma exposes flip side of housing boom

Vanishing kids: silent crisis hits key Sydney suburbs

The post Property investor savvy tactics leaving average homebuyers stuck appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Property investor savvy tactics leaving average homebuyers stuck

HIA: stamp duty behind 500,000 less homes, $40k home loan hit

Stamp duty story (HIA) - artwork - for herald sun real estate

Homebuyers in two Aussie states face the biggest risk if they make one mortgage mistake.

A desperate Aussie home buying tactic is costing owners upwards of $40,000, and it’s largely because of their state government.

A new Housing Industry Association report has revealed some of the jaw-dropping hidden costs of stamp duty taxes around the nation, including the added whack for purchasers who opt to borrow the money needed to cover the upfront tax.

The Association’s Stamp Duty Watch report released yesterday called for changes to the tax nationwide if Australia is to reach its 1.2 million new homes National Housing Accord target, but especially for states hitting foreign investors with the biggest additional costs.

RELATED: Single mums reveal how they became property investors

Australia’s property shift: Units now outperforming houses

Australia’s worst neighbours exposed


Their figures indicate higher tax bills for foreign property investors had wiped out more than 500,000 new home builds nationwide across the past decade — significantly exacerbating the nation’s current housing and rental crisis.

For local homebuyers, HIA senior economist Tom Devitt said their calculations showed the typical homebuyer who borrowed to cover their stamp duty would be paying more than $40,000 in extra stamp duty costs in NSW, Victoria and South Australia.

Stamp duty costs are set independently by state governments.

Over the course of a 30 year loan at a 6.55 per cent average variable rate, Victoria’s nation-topping 5.3 per cent stamp duty cost for a $729,000 typical home leads to a $38,810 stamp duty payment. Put that on your mortgage and it would cost you another $48,229, for an eye-watering total north of $81,000.

HIA - cost of paying a mortgage on stamp duty - for herald sun real estate

How much more you would pay if you borrowed to cover the cost of stamp duty.

Nationally, the average added cost would be $38,786 — on top of an initial $31,211 stamp duty for a $785,000 home.

Queensland has the lowest stamp duty cost in the nation at 2.7 per cent, or about $21,220 for a $786,000 typical home. Adding that sum to your mortgage would add about $26,370 to the final mortgage bill over 30 years.

Mr Devitt said that the added money lost from budgets would also lead to “opportunity costs” — as households lost the option for investing the money instead, or for putting it towards other things such as holidays.

The alternative for many homebuyers is to compromise on home features or location.

While a smaller back yard was unlikely to have significant ramifications, Mr Devitt said a longer commute would not only cost owners more in petrol — but also came with “environmental costs as people spend more time on freeways”.

Housing Industry Association senior economist Tom Devitt said Aussie homebuyers face a choice between less home, or a longer commute and heightened stamp duty costs.

Smart Lending managing director Melissa Gielnik said it was generally a bad idea for buyers to borrow stamp duty costs.

Banks will not allow for it without a guarantor over the loan, typically family, or without the buyers reducing their deposit — which would further increase the size of their mortgage.

If a lender did let the buyer do it, there was a significant chance they would be facing lenders mortgage insurance costs they might have otherwise avoided.

While scrapping the much maligned tax wouldn’t directly add to the cost of homes, Ms Gielnik said it was likely a way would have to be found to stop vendors becoming greedy and demanding more money from prospective buyers — or prices would rise.

The stamp duty costs for foreign investors have also had significant impacts on the nation’s new home supply.

HIA chief economist Tim Reardon estimated that with the number of new multi-unit dwellings effectively being halved for the past decade since state government’s began adding additional stamp duty costs for foreign investors in 2015, Australia had missed out on more than 500,000 new homes.

“That would have had a substantial impact … if they had all happened, rental price growth would have been 2-3 per cent a year, rather than the 5-15 per cent that we have seen,” Mr Reardon said.

“We would be seeing rental vacancy rates above 3 per cent.”

HIA Breakfast

HIA Chief Economist Tim Reardon has estimated added charges for foreign investor stamp duty have cost the nation close to 500,000 new homes builds since 2015. Picture: Tertius Pickard.

The economist added that “close to 100 per cent” of any additional stamp duty costs paid by international investors developing apartment buildings would be passed on to buyers in heightened costs, or to tenants in higher rents.

“Government’s can tax whoever they like, but the impost will be born by the Australian household in the end,” he said.

With the federal government increasing migration for much of the past 10 years, the result had been increasing population amid lower incentives for foreign funds to support new builds — driving up home prices as well.

The alternative was that they took their money elsewhere.

“If Sydney in Australia is going to tax you, upfront, an additional $160,000 compared to other countries, they (investors) will take that capital elsewhere — it’s very liquid,” Mr Reardon said.

“And Australia’s mum and dad investors don’t have the capital to build apartment complexes,” Mr Reardon said.

The economist added that without changes to stamp duty taxes, particularly for international buyers, there was no way for Australia to reach a 1.2 million new homes by 2029 target set as part of the National Housing Accord.

TREASURER CHALMERS

A 1.2 million new homes target set by federal treasurer Jim Chalmers is facing headwinds as a result of state government tax systems.Picture: Martin Ollman.

FIRB stats show in the 2014-2015 financial year there were $60.8bn worth of Aussie home sales approved to internationals.

In the 2023-2024 financial year there were just $6.6bn in foreign residential real estate sales in Australia. Latest stats show that in the first three months of the current financial year the figure was just $1.3bn.


Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox.

MORE: ‘I’d be locked out’: Mum’s $65k home warning

‘Major lift’: Shock Aus city tops price boom

Inside shoe king’s luxury Toorak digs

The post HIA: stamp duty behind 500,000 less homes, $40k home loan hit appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39HIA: stamp duty behind 500,000 less homes, $40k home loan hit

Coffin Bay holiday home tipped to smash suburb’s price record

A luxury Coffin Bay holiday home, that rents for $1200 a night, looks set to smash property records amid expectations it will sell for more than $3m.

The Lobster Pot, at 10 Pelican Court, has a private jetty and an enviable beachfront location with uninterrupted views across the bay.

The property is one of the highest-priced holiday rentals in the Coffin Bay area and has attracted significant buyer interest for its earning potential, said selling agent Georgie Kemp, of Kemp Real Estate.

MORE: The suburb where rents have hit a staggering height

The Coffin Bay property at 10 Pelican Court is an impressive holiday home.

It has its own jetty.

The property is one of the highest-priced holiday rentals in the Coffin Bay area, renting for $1200 per night.

It has an epic view of the ocean.

“It’s one of those iconic Coffin Bay homes that everyone knows,’’ Ms Kemp said.

“It’s got its own jetty, which not many properties have, so there’s a lot of inquiries from people with boats that want to come over for fishing trips.

“And the home has been renovated from top to bottom, with no expense spared.

“It was originally a shack but it’s been fully guttered and renovated to the extent that you don’t see any of the old shack now.

“It’s a property that’s got everything – the location, the jetty and the rental returns.’’

Holiday rental booking platform Rent by Owner currently lists The Lobster Pot for rent from $1201 a night.

Ms Kemp said the vendor had made a tidy income from the property over the years, while still retaining it for their own use when desired.

She said the property would make an enviable primary residence with a stunning three-bedroom home that has an open-plan lounge and dining area, floor-to-ceiling glazed windows and doors that framed the ocean views.

A spacious undercover entertainment area offered a built-in BBQ and a wood-burning heater and there was also a separate sauna room.

A detached self-contained flat, with a stylish bedroom, kitchenette and bathroom, still allowed the ability for rental income, Ms Kemp said.

MORE: Rare land sending buyers into a frenzy

It’s contemporary throughout and open to make the most of the coastal air.

It’s lavish at every turn.

It has four bedrooms and three bathrooms.

The property is for sale without a price guide.

She said Coffin Bay was growing in popularity among holidaymakers, who now preferred it to busier tourist towns.

“Obviously during school holidays, Easter time, Christmas time and over the summer, Coffin Bay is always a popular destination but even now, when it’s colder, the caravan park is still flat out,’’ Ms Kemp said.

“We’ve seen a bit of a shift (increase in visitor activity) – places (closer to Adelaide) like Victor Harbor are quite busy now so people are heading to Coffin Bay instead.

“It’s still a small town but it’s a buzzing little place with lots of great little cafes and shops.’’

Ms Kemp said the property’s vendor was seeking offers upwards of $3m, which would set a new house record for Coffin Bay.

The current record is $1.715m, set in 2022 with the sale of another waterfront home, which also had a private jetty.

– by Lauren Ahwan

The post Coffin Bay holiday home tipped to smash suburb’s price record appeared first on realestate.com.au.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Coffin Bay holiday home tipped to smash suburb’s price record

Opendoor will pay $39M to settle pricing algorithm lawsuit

Opendoor has agreed to pay $39 million to settle a lawsuit that alleges the company misled investors about the reliability of its pricing technology, according to court documents filed Friday.

The proposed settlement — filed in federal court in Arizona and first reported by Reuters — must still be approved by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi.

Investors sued the San Francisco-based company in 2022, claiming Opendoor misrepresented its pricing algorithm as an artificial intelligence-powered system that could outpace traditional real estate firms.

In reality, the suit alleges, the platform relied heavily on human input and was just as vulnerable to market fluctuations as any other brokerage.

Opendoor did not admit to any wrongdoing as part of the deal, and it said in a filing that it was settling to avoid the costs and risks of prolonged litigation.

The company did not immediately respond to HousingWire‘s request for comment.

The lawsuit also claims Opendoor’s stock price plummeted more than 94% between its market debut in December 2020 and November 2022.

In a court filing, plaintiffs’ attorneys described the $39 million agreement as “a prompt and substantial tangible recovery.” They said they will seek up to 30% of the settlement — approximately $11.7 million — in legal fees.

Opendoor reported $1.2 billion in first-quarter 2025 revenue, with 2,946 homes sold between January and March.

In 2022, the company bought nearly 35,000 homes, but it acquired just 14,684 in 2024.

At the end of Q1 2025, Opendoor had about 1,050 homes under contract for purchase just and has sought aggressive cost-cutting measures.

Last week, the company laid off 40 employees in a move labeled as a “targeted restructuring,” as it continues to overhaul operations and reduce losses.

The layoffs primarily affected the sales team and come amid a broader shift toward what Opendoor describes as a “multi-product, multi-channel” business model.

Seventy employees were also reassigned to unspecified new roles as part of the restructuring. Previous rounds of layoffs at Opendoors have sometimes topped more than 500 workers.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Opendoor will pay $39M to settle pricing algorithm lawsuit

IRS stipulation could have consequences for seniors in a declining stock market

Growing fears of a retirement crisis in the U.S. are no secret as Americans face a future that potentially includes fewer Social Security benefits. But the uncertainty of Social Security is not the only thing that seniors should consider as they seek to safeguard their financial well-being.

Over the weekend, The New York Times detailed the problem of required minimum distributions, or RMDs, from retirement accounts at a time of uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets. The outlet interviewed a self-proclaimed “lifelong saver” who saw her investment balances drop by $60,000 this spring in the wake of global tariff increases under the Trump administration.

The Times explained that the IRS requires some Americans with tax-deferred retirement plans, including 401(k)s and individual retirement accounts (IRAs), to draw down their savings or face penalties. These distributions are taxed as income and “can be painful when retirees have to sell assets in a falling market,” the story noted.

Kentucky resident Shelby French, a 75-year-old retiree, said she uses her required minimum distributions to pay “big things” like long-term care premiums, property taxes and homeowners insurance.

Typically, she spreads out the withdrawals in smaller amounts over the course of the year. But as 2025 began and French saw more downside risks in the stock market, she went against the guidance of her financial adviser by taking a single lump sum in January and placing the proceeds into a high-yield savings account.

“I put all my R.M.D. in savings because who even knows if Social Security is going to exist, with DOGE and all,” French said, referring to government cost-cutting efforts under the U.S. DOGE Service. “All this stuff that’s going on, it sort of undermines your confidence.”

The report noted that in 2022, Congress changed some key rules for retirement account withdrawals. Under the SECURE 2.0 Act, people born between 1951 and 1960 must begin taking mandatory withdrawals at age 73, up from 72 under the prior law. People born in 1960 or later can wait until they turn 75 before taking RMDs.

But because these mandated distributions are based on account balances at the end of the prior calendar year, a market downturn in the ensuing months essentially means “they have to withdraw a proportionately larger amount to meet their required minimum,” the Times explained.

“It feels like this has happened a lot — you get a market turn in January and all of a sudden, you’re taking an R.M.D. off a December balance that doesn’t exist anymore,” Tim Steffen, director of advanced planning at private wealth manager Baird, told the outlet. “Now your percentage you have to take out becomes much higher.”

Some financial advisers recommend that clients estimate their required distribution and set aside an equivalent amount that isn’t invested in stocks to avoid having to sell in a down market.

“If you’re concerned about inflation being more aggressive due to tariff policy, then the lesson would be to raise the cash now,” Jonathan Lee, an investment portfolio manager at U.S. Bank Private Wealth Management, told the Times. “You can essentially maintain a cash bucket if you know what your R.M.D. is for 2025.”

Alvino Lo, chief wealth strategist for Wilmington Trust, noted that regular monthly withdrawals can be a smart strategy as distributions taken when the market is up balance out those taken at a loss. And for retirees who wish to leave their retirement savings to heirs, a declining market could be an opportune time to convert assets to a Roth IRA and reduce the taxes owed, she said.

“It’s a little bit of making lemonade out of lemons,” Lo said.

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39IRS stipulation could have consequences for seniors in a declining stock market

Robert Reffkin continues his digital crusade against Zillow, Clear Cooperation

Tensions between Compass CEO Robert Reffkin and Zillow are continuing to build in the lead up to Zillow’s new listing standards going into effect later this month.

Reffkin followed up last week’s LinkedIn post claiming that Zillow no longer displays all MLS listings to prospective homebuyers, with two more posts.

On Friday, Reffkin highlighted Zillow’s iBuying business, which operated between 2018 and 2021, during which time Zillow bought more than 20,000 homes from homeowners who sold their properties directly to Zillow, bypassing the MLS. 

“Now, Zillow research claims homeowners lose money if they don’t use the MLS,” Reffkin wrote. “When Zillow was making money buying homes off the MLS, it supported off-MLS sales. Now that it can’t profit from leads on those off-MLS listings, they say it’s bad for homeowners to list off the MLS. Either Zillow’s “research” that homes sell for less off the MLS is flawed, or they spent 3.5 years taking advantage of homesellers. Only one can be true.” 

Reffkin’s claims that Zillow “profited” off its iBuying business is not completely accurate. In Q3 2021, Zillow reported a net loss of $328 million, mostly due to a $421 million net loss before taxes on Zillow Offers. In total Zillow lost roughly $1.5 billion in three years due to its iBuying program, but it was after the close of Q3 2021 that Zillow decided to shut down its iBuying program, citing of course the mounting losses the operation was causing for the firm. 

After the close of its iBuying operation, Zillow struck a deal with iBuyer Opendoor in August 2022. Through the partnership, Zillow users can use the platform to request and offer from Opendoor. It is this partnership that Reffkin highlighted in a second LinkedIn post on Sunday. 

“Even this weekend, ZIllow is sending emails like this to homeowners encouraging them to sell off the MLS through their Opendoor iBuyer partnership, despite Zilllow’s ‘research’ stating that homeowners lose money if they don’t use the MLS. On www.zillow.com/sell Zillow gives sellers four options to sell,” the Compass CEO wrote. “While all four options use the Zillow platform, two of the four options encourage homeowners to sell off the MLS. Zillow supports selling homes off the MLS if they can make money from it, but if an agent lists off the MLS where Zillow can’t make money from the listing then Zillow bans it. Zillow is ok with Zillow providing off-MLS options to homesellers, but Zillow bans agents that do so. The hypocrisy is crystal clear.” 

The options Zillow gives sellers is selling a property with an agent, as a for sale by owner (FSBO) or an all-cash offer from Opendoor. According to Zillow’s research, in 2023 and 2024, home sellers who did not list on the MLS lost $1 billion in sale proceeds, an average of $5,000 each or 1.5% less than what those listing on the MLS sold for.; In communities of color, this number jumped to 3.2%, more than double the 1.2% loss recorded in majority-white neighborhoods, Zillow said. 

In majority-Black neighborhoods, Zillow’s analysis found home sellers who did not list on the MLS saw a median sale price difference of $9,851, while in majority-Hispanic neighborhoods, the number jumped to $13,728.

In a variety of public forums, including in an opinion piece published in the Chicago Tribune last week, Errol Samuelson, Zillow’s head of investor relations, argued that Zillow supports a seller’s ability to market their home as they choose. 

“To be clear, sellers and their agents have the choices they need to market their homes, whether their goal is to maximize price or privacy, or something in between. They can sell their home completely privately off the Multiple Listing Service and third-party websites. They can make it available only to other agents in the market to share with their buyers one-on-one. They can keep the address or photos from being shown online. They can even list it on the MLS but keep the listing off the internet entirely,” Samuelson wrote. “None of that is changing, nor should it. Sellers should retain full control over how and where they market their homes.”

Samuelson and Zillow claim that the option that Compass is trying to “protect” is one that is not about sellers but instead about their bottom line. 

“They are choosing to make more money by persuading sellers that limiting which and how many buyers can see their home is somehow good. They are engineering private marketplaces that benefit themselves while actively harming buyers and sellers, all the while framing the practice as pro-consumer,” Samuelson wrote. 

Zillow’s listing standards go into effect on June 30. The policy allows for delayed marketing exempt listings and “coming-soon” listings that are entered into the MLS within one day of public marketing, as well as true office exclusive properties that are only marketed within the listing brokerage or  via one-to-one communication with agents at other firms.

Additionally, Zillow is allowing listing agents to share sneak peaks of listings on social media or in an email newsletter to buyers, as long as these posts do not include identifiable details about the property, such as price or address, or a call to action. 

June 17, 2025/0 Comments/by JKents
https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png 0 0 JKents https://www.juliankent.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/logo.png JKents2025-06-17 00:02:392025-06-17 00:02:39Robert Reffkin continues his digital crusade against Zillow, Clear Cooperation
Page 44 of 96«‹4243444546›»
Search Search
  • Modern Single EntryJuly 15, 2015 - 3:48 pm
  • Classic Single EntryJuly 15, 2015 - 3:48 pm
  • Classic Single Entry #2July 15, 2015 - 3:46 pm
  • MacBook PRO & SSDJuly 15, 2015 - 3:41 pm

Categories

  • No categories

JKDS is a licensed New York State real estate brokerage firm. #10351200205

Interesting Links

  • Stratagem
  • Brokerage
  • Property Management
  • Contact

Where to find us

347 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1402
New York, 10016
Phone: +1.888.559.5333

Our Office Hours

Monday-Friday: 7:00-19:00
Saturday: 10:00-17:00
Sunday: 12:00-16:00

© Copyright - JulianKent Development Stratagem LTD
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

AcceptCloseSettings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsClose